🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has upheld a ban on deploying national guard in Portland, Oregon, after a recent legal decision.

Judicial Panel Concurs to Rehear Case

The ninth circuit court of appeals ruled on this week that it would reexamine the legal dispute concerning the executive power with an larger group of eleven justices. The court also overturned a earlier ruling from a three-judge panel that had supported the federal government.

Legal Saga Over Military Presence

This order represents the most recent development in a long-running court case over whether the former president has the legal right and valid reason to deploy national guard forces in Portland. Approximately two hundred troops have been in uncertainty since the end of September when the deployment effort was started in response to ongoing demonstrations.

Differing Viewpoints

The federal government has claimed that government employees at the immigration center in the southern part of the city were under attack, while city and state officials maintain that municipal police have command of the circumstances.

In defiance of characterizations of the city as “war ravaged”, locals have been posting videos of scenic paths and a thriving food scene, and organizing activities such as an protest bicycle event against the “militarization of our city”.

Recent Legal Actions

The Tuesday ruling came after a US district judge in the city enacted two temporary restraining orders this month – one preventing the federalization of the state troops, and another stopping the deployment of any national guard troops in Oregon, after efforts to circumvent the initial injunction by mobilizing out-of-state forces.

On the previous day, the ninth circuit panel had put the first ruling on hold – permitting control of state troops – but the second ruling stayed effective, preventing the physical sending of the troops.

Full Panel Consideration

The latest ruling means the matter will be heard by the full court – with both rulings under consideration simultaneously – by a group of 11 judges.

“This ruling demonstrates that the truth matters and that the courts are striving to hold this administration accountable. The founding document limits the president’s power, and Oregon’s communities cannot be treated as a training ground for expansive government power,” said the state attorney general in a official comment.

“The judicial body is sending a clear message: the president cannot send the military into US cities without cause. We will continue defending state legislation, values, and sovereignty as this case moves forward and our legal battle continues in the courts.”